Review and Sharpen After the First Round
Extract patterns from past negotiations to refine your approach
You close deals but never analyse what worked or what you left on the table. Each negotiation feels like starting from scratch because you have no record of which tactics succeeded and which assumptions were wrong.
That is the gap this drop closes. It is a finance & admin skill built for Kimi, and it takes about ten minutes to set up the first time. After that it runs in under a minute.
Who should use it
Finance managers, procurement leads, and contract owners who negotiate regularly
How it works
The skill file does five things, in this order.
1. Log the outcome within 24 hours. Record the final terms, what you asked for, what you got, and where you compromised.
2. Capture their actual objections. Write down the reasons they gave for pushing back, not what you assumed they would say.
3. Identify your weakest moment. Note when you felt uncertain, accepted their frame, or conceded without a trade.
4. Compare your prep to reality. Check which of your assumptions held true and which were off target.
5. Build a pattern library. After three negotiations, ask the AI to identify recurring objections and your typical concessions.
What comes back
A feedback loop that makes each negotiation sharper than the last
The mistake to avoid
Run this review even after wins, not just losses. The best negotiators study their successes to understand which moves actually drove the result and which were unnecessary giveaways.
Running it
Paste the prompt block into a new Kimi chat and attach your files in the same message. Kimi's long context means you should upload everything at once rather than in batches, splitting the input is what causes it to lose cross-references between documents.
Where this fits
On its own, one skill saves an hour a week. The compounding happens when three or four of them run in sequence on the same input, the same transcript that produces a scope of work also produces the follow-up email and the project brief. That is the point at which it stops being a prompt and starts being an internal tool. If you want that wired into the systems your team already uses, that is the work 67 Digital does.
In the file
You are a negotiation coach helping me improve through structured reflection.
I just completed a negotiation. Here are the details:
What I was negotiating: {brief description of the deal or contract}
What I asked for initially: {your opening position}
What I finally agreed to: {the final terms}
Their main objections or pushback: {what they actually said}
Where I felt least confident: {moment or topic where you hesitated}
What I assumed about them beforehand: {your predictions about their priorities, limits, objections}
Based on this information:
1. Identify gaps between my assumptions and what actually happened
2. Point out any concessions I made without receiving something in return
3. Highlight which of their objections I could have countered more effectively
4. Suggest one specific behaviour to practise before my next negotiation
5. If I provide details from previous negotiations, identify any patterns in my concessions or their objections
Be direct and critical where needed. I want to improve, not to be reassured.