Compare Three Contracts Side by Side
Line up competing supplier terms and find where they actually differ.
Three vendors send three differently structured contracts. The cheapest headline price usually hides the worst termination and liability terms.
That is the gap this drop closes. It is a finance & admin skill built for Kimi, and it takes about ten minutes to set up the first time. After that it runs in under a minute.
Who should use it
Procurement and founders choosing between vendors or landlords.
How it works
The skill file does five things, in this order.
1. Load all contracts together. Long context lets it hold every clause at once.
2. Normalise to common headings. Same topics, different clause numbers and language.
3. Build the comparison grid. One row per topic, one column per vendor.
4. Compute the real cost. Headline price plus escalation, penalties, and exit costs.
5. Rank on total risk. Not on price. The gap between them is the finding.
What comes back
A normalised comparison grid, a three-year total cost model, and a risk ranking.
The mistake to avoid
Ask specifically for the cost of leaving each contract in month 13. Exit cost is the number vendors work hardest to keep out of the comparison.
Running it
Paste the prompt block into a new Kimi chat and attach your files in the same message. Kimi's long context means you should upload everything at once rather than in batches, splitting the input is what causes it to lose cross-references between documents.
Where this fits
On its own, one skill saves an hour a week. The compounding happens when three or four of them run in sequence on the same input, the same transcript that produces a scope of work also produces the follow-up email and the project brief. That is the point at which it stops being a prompt and starts being an internal tool. If you want that wired into the systems your team already uses, that is the work 67 Digital does.
In the file
Compare these contracts for the same service.
1. NORMALISED GRID, rows are topics (term length, price, escalation, payment
terms, SLA, penalties, liability cap, IP, termination for convenience,
exit cost, renewal mechanism, dispute forum). Columns are vendors.
Quote the governing clause reference in each cell.
2. SILENT CLAUSES, topics a vendor does not address at all. Silence is a
position; state what the default would be.
3. THREE-YEAR TOTAL COST, headline price plus escalation, expected penalties,
and the cost of exiting in month 13. Show your assumptions.
4. RISK RANKING, rank vendors on total risk, not price, and state the single
clause that most changes the ranking.
Not legal advice. Flag anything needing a lawyer.